And they went into the ark to Noah, two by two, of all flesh in which is the breath of life. So those that entered, male and female of all flesh, went in as God had commanded him; and the LORD shut him in. (Genesis 7:15-16 NKJV)
Monday, January 2, 2023
THE CLOSED THE DOOR
Sunday, January 1, 2023
MYSTERY OF THE TWO WITNESSES, LESS MYSTERIOUS
The last month of 2022, I spent a lot of time studying the Book of Revelation in greater depth than ever before. Actually, I don’t know if “in depth” is the best description of my study. It has been more like stepping back to get a broader view in light of the whole of Scripture, particularly the Old Testament Prophets. It also involved turning the theological kaleidoscope to see a different pattern than the one through which I viewed God’s redemptive plan in Bible college and seminary. As a result, the glorious message of the Revelation has become clearer than ever before. The mystery has become less mysterious.
One chapter in particular lit up brighter and more glorious
to me than the most spectacular New Years fireworks: Chapter 11: The ministry,
death, resurrection, and catching up to heaven of the two witnesses. My formal
theological training applied mathematical logic to deduce that the two
witnesses were two individuals who had not, up to that point died. And since
“it is appointed unto men once to die” (Hebrews 9:27), they must come back and
suffer death for their witness. Also, they must be Old Testament persons since
everything in the Book of Revelation after 4:1 pertains to God’s dealings with
Israel—not the church. Or so the theory goes.
Based on this logical and literal
approach, it was deduced that the two witnesses had to be Enoch (Genesis 5:24)
and Elijah (2 Kings 2:11) since those two were caught up to heaven without
dying. But there was some disagreement in that camp about Enoch. Since Enoch
was not part of Israel, and most of Revelation is about Israel, so the theory
goes, Moses was suggested as being one of the two witnesses. Supporting that
argument was the fact that the miracles the two witnesses perform are like
those God did through Elijah and Moses. (Revelation 11:6) Never mind the fact
that Moses doesn’t fit the first criterion for being one of the two: Moses died
once! So we’re left with a mystery. Yet it’s a mystery of only intellectual
interest. It has no practical spiritual application to anyone living today—or
in John’s day, for that matter.
The mystery becomes much less
mysterious when we recognize that the Book of Revelation is filled with
symbols, and those symbols picture spiritual truths as applicable today as they
were in John’s day. The Book of Revelation was written for “the churches” from
beginning to end (1:4; 22:16). Jesus is encouraging His church as it goes
through the trials and persecution of this age. John’s visions are all to that
end.
So who are the two witnesses? They
are a symbolic representation of the Church. I know this is a shock to those
who, like I, were taught otherwise, but there are solid reasons for seeing the
Church as symbolized in the two witnesses.
First, the beast “makes war” with
the witnesses (Rev. 11:7). It would hardly be necessary for this wicked world
ruler to make war with two individuals! He could simply arrest them and execute
them (as is depicted in Stephen King’s novel and mini-series, The Stand).
The truth is, this evil world system is at war with God’s people. It resents
the testimony of the church against its sins. The followers of the beast will
not be content until they have silenced once and for all this witness against
them!
But why two? All truth has to be
established by at least two witnesses (Deuteronomy 17:6; 19:15; Matthew 18:16;
2 Corinthians 13:1; 1 Timothy 5:19; Hebrews 10:28). The Holy Spirit, through
the testimony of the Church, “convict[s] the world of sin, and of
righteousness, and of judgment.” (John 16:8. See also Acts 24:25) The two witnesses are
given “authority” from God to preach His truth, that is, to prophesy. (Rev.
11:3 cf. Matthew 28:18-20). They do so in sackcloth, a symbol of mourning and
repentance. They are calling the world to repentance and they mourn for the
condition of the lost. (Compare Ezekiel 9:4)
It is also significant that of the
seven churches addressed in Revelation 2 & 3, only two were completely
faithful, and they were persecuted for it. Christ encourages the faithful
churches and the Church as a whole to remain “faithful unto death” (2:10)
because a better world is coming. Christ’s victory is certain!
The real clincher for me came as I
was collating my chapter summaries for the Book of Revelation. How would I succinctly
summarize the contents of Revelation 11?
“Two Witnesses and Last Trumpet”
Does that sound familiar?
Behold,
I tell you a mystery: We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed—in a
moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will
sound, and the dead will be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.
(1 Corinthians 15:51-52)
My decades long journey to
understand this final book of the Bible, this final message of Christ to His churches,
has encouraged me to press on with my witness for Christ and to look
expectantly for His triumphant return.
“But you
shall receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you; and you shall be
witnesses to Me in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of
the earth." (Acts 1:8)
Tuesday, November 15, 2022
NOT LIKE ALL THE NATIONS
Ezekiel 25:8
This verse demonstrates the danger of thinking that Judah, and by extension, the Jewish people, are “like all the nations,” that God has no more concern for them than He has for any other people group. The Church is not a “replacement” for ethnic Israel but the fulfillment of the New Covenant promised to “the house of Israel and the house of Judah” (Jeremiah 31:31). At the same time, it is an error to think, as dispensationalists do, that God has a separate plan for the nation Israel apart from the Church, which was founded by Israel’s Messiah. God’s plan is for the Jews to repent and be “grafted” back into the olive tree of blessing, since they are “the natural branches” (Romans 11:24) and are “beloved on account of the fathers” (Rom. 11:28). “The gifts and calling of God are irrevocable” (Rom. 11:29). God’s reputation is at stake. He will not be seen as a failure in His purpose for Israel. Jesus’s words to the Samaritan woman are weighty: “Salvation is from the Jews” (John 4:22).
Side note: It is the Roman Catholic Church that has usurped the Old Covenant relationship of Israel for themselves. They adopted candles, holy water, a special priesthood and hierarchy with priestly vestments, and repeated sacrifices (the mass). The RCC even adopted the OT restriction against lending money on interest to “your brother.” Ironically, since the Jews of Europe were not considered “brethren,” they were allowed to conduct necessary bank financing! Thus the Jews became the principle bankers of Europe, for which they were unjustly condemned in the 1930’s.
It should
not be surprising, then, that Protestant denominations that believe the church has
replaced Israel in God’s plan have moved ever closer to Roman Catholic
practices in worship. Still, I was appalled when I witnessed a Christian Reformed
pastor elevate the bread at communion and say, “The body of Christ,” and then
elevate the cup and say, “The blood of Christ.”
Tuesday, October 18, 2022
WHO’S COUNTING?
If You, LORD, were to keep account of guilty deeds, Lord, who could stand? But there is forgiveness with You, So that You may be revered. (Psalm 130:3-4 NASB)
Friday, October 14, 2022
THE FINAL DAY OF ATONEMENT
‘For behold, the stone that I have put before Joshua; on one stone are seven eyes. Behold, I am going to engrave an inscription on it,’ declares the LORD of armies, ‘and I will remove the guilt of that land in one day. (Zechariah 3:9)
Sunday, August 14, 2022
THE MINE FIELD OF CHURCH DISCIPLINE
If anyone does not obey what we say in this letter, take note of that person, and have nothing to do with him, that he may be ashamed. Do not regard him as an enemy, but warn him as a brother. (2 Thessalonians 3:14-15)
Paul’s directions regarding a brother who is disobedient to
Paul’s teaching in that epistle, though stern, are much less severe that his
directive to the Corinthian church in 1 Corinthians 5:1-5. In the immediate
context of 2 Thessalonians 3, Paul is dealing with unruliness and idleness in
the church; in 1 Corinthians he deals with scandalous immorality, even in the
eyes of unbelievers.
Church discipline is delicate matter. Misuse of it has split
churches; neglect of it has polluted churches. The question is: What is the
standard for church discipline? In other words, what sort of sins and to what
degree call for church discipline?
I know of a Bible-professing church in a mainstream
denomination that has tolerated adultery and the consequential divorce and
remarriage, and all parties remained church members. Their emphasis was on love
and they did love! The only case of church discipline I have heard of in that
church was a man who committed a felony and received a jail sentence!
On the other hand, churches can be too exacting in their exercise
of church discipline. I know of another church that used church discipline to
purge the congregation of members who were critical of the direction the church
as going. Any number of Scriptural injunctions may have been used to “discipline”
the “unruly” members! Not surprisingly, the church spit and split again, and it
no longer exists under its former name.
It has been suggested that unless the great majority of the
church agrees that a certain sin calls for discipline, it should not be imposed.
But what if it is clearly identified as sin in the Bible? In that case there is
a bigger problem: why does not the vast majority of the congregation not see it
as serious? The individual sin in question is only a symptom of wide-spread
carnality in the congregation. That condition requires better teaching,
preaching, and much prayer to bring the people to an understanding of their
sinful condition and repentance. That is what happened in King Josiah’s time
when the Book of the Law was uncovered while cleaning out the Temple.
And Hilkiah the high priest said to Shaphan
the secretary, “I have found the Book of the Law in the house of the LORD.” And
Hilkiah gave the book to Shaphan, and he read it. And Shaphan the secretary
came to the king, and reported to the king, “Your servants have emptied out the
money that was found in the house and have delivered it into the hand of the
workmen who have the oversight of the house of the LORD.” Then Shaphan the
secretary told the king, “Hilkiah the priest has given me a book.” And Shaphan
read it before the king. When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law,
he tore his clothes. And the king commanded Hilkiah the priest, and Ahikam the
son of Shaphan, and Achbor the son of Micaiah, and Shaphan the secretary, and
Asaiah the king's servant, saying, “Go, inquire of the LORD for me, and for the
people, and for all Judah, concerning the words of this book that has been
found. For great is the wrath of the LORD that is kindled against us, because
our fathers have not obeyed the words of this book, to do according to all that
is written concerning us.” (2 Kings 22:8-13)
Revival happened again among the returning remnants from Babylon
when Ezra and the Levites read and explained the Law of God:
Thursday, August 11, 2022
THE BIG PICTURE
Many Christians form their beliefs from isolated Bible texts taken out of context, rather than from an integrated understanding of the progressive revelation of the whole Bible.
In order to properly understand any particular passage of Scripture, it is necessary to consider carefully the context of the passage. The three primary rules of Bible interpretation are, "Context, Context, and Context." Otherwise, an isolated passage could be made to say almost anything.
Here are some contexts we must observe when studying a passage of Scripture:
1. We must observe the immediate context, the paragraph and the theme of that book of the Bible. What is the overall theme of the book? How does the passage we're studying develop that theme?
2. We must consider the context of the whole Bible and how the passage we are studying fits into the progressive revelation of God and His plan. This means, of course, that if we have not read through the entire Bible (more than once) we are not well-equipped to make definitive interpretations individual passages! That does not mean that a new Christian cannot gain spiritual benefit from a given passage until he has read the whole Bible, but it does mean he should approach the Bible humbly with a learner's attitude, willing to grow in his understanding.
3. We must consider the historical and interpersonal context of a passage. Books of the Bible were written in a particular time and place and to particular people. What was the setting in which the book was written? Who was it addressed to and why?
4. We must seek to understand the literary context of a passage. The Bible includes different kinds of literature: History, Biography, Instruction, Parables, Poetry, Prophecy, Apocalyptic, Letters (both personal and formal), and various subcategories. Many errors in interpretation and doctrine come from not considering the kind of literature the passage is found in.
In conclusion, the Bible is not to a book of inspirational sayings. It is, as W. Graham Scroggie expressed it, "The Unfolding Drama of Redemption." The Bible the progressive revelation of God and His plan for the redemption of fallen people and all of fallen creation. Failure to see that Big Picture is what has led to myriad errors in interpretation. And the Internet is replete with "Bible teachers" who are all too willing to share their errors!